Correlation between space and society

【Coexistence of presence and non-existence】

From this time, let's turn the viewpoint of consideration little by little from "this world" to "you" individual.

First of all, let's start from "0" as a review.

Everything starts with "0".

Think of this as a way of thinking, not a chronological order.

"0" represents the state of nothing, so it is balanced in every sense, that is, the state of "equilibrium".

At the same time, this state was the same as ``∞'', meaning ``all sets that cancel each other''.

"0" and "∞" are two sides of the same coin, just like light and shadow.

This world is a set of "∞" universes that cancel each other out.

It is a relative existence that is "0" from the outside perspective of this world, but "∞" from the inside perspective of this world.

In addition, each universe, which is the element, is a "finite universe" from the outside perspective, but is a relative existence that becomes an "infinite universe" from the inner perspective of the universe.

It is difficult to imagine a scene that is "finite" or "infinite" depending on the position of the observer.

Let's take a moment to consider this.

In the following, I will consider "Relativity of space-time and velocity" and "Essence of division and division by 0".

First, "finite" and "infinite" presuppose the existence of "time and space".

This is because the absence of "time and space" means "0".

Now consider the following case.

Suppose there is a "photon" that has traveled a distance of 10 billion light years in outer space.

From the outer vantage point of outer space, "photons" can be seen traveling at a "finite" speed, the speed of light, over 10 billion years.

However, from the viewpoint of "photon", it was instantaneously traveling a distance of 10 billion light years.

This is because time does not move for an object moving at the speed of light.

In this case, can we say that the moving speed for the "photon" is the "finite" speed of light?

The distance traveled by a "photon" is 10 billion light-years, and the time required to travel is "0" hours from the viewpoint of the "photon".

Velocity is distance divided by time, so in this case 10 billion light years divided by 0 hours.

Now let's take a moment to consider division by "0" in mathematics.

Mathematically, dividing any number by "0" is said to be "computation undefined".

In the case of "A ÷ 0", it seems that there is no number to divide "A", so it does not make sense as a calculation...

Is it really so?

What is the essence of division?

In general, there are two ways to divide an arbitrary quantity by an arbitrary number of people, which is to calculate the quantity per person. It seems to be said that there are two purposes of "inclusive exclusion", which means calculating how many sets it will be.

However, these are only "purposes of use" and not "essence".

For example, "6 ÷ 6" means how many "..." are in "..." when the number is expressed with ".", and the answer is "1 " will be.

Similarly, "6÷3" has "2" "..." in "...".

"6÷2" has "3" "..." in "...".

"6 ÷ 1" means that there are "6" "・" in "・・・・・・・・".

In other words, the essence of division "A÷B" is to express "the number of elements B that exist in set A".

If so, "6÷0" means how many "" are in "...".

That's right, the element " " contains an uncountable number, so the answer is "∞".

(This is an example of the statement "if you allow 0, you must allow ∞")

Back to the story.

From the above considerations, the answer to the speed of "10 billion light years ÷ 0 hours" is "∞".

If the speed is "∞", the distance traveled at that speed is also "∞".

In other words, the cosmic space seen from the viewpoint of "photons" has an "infinite" size.

yeah?

It's funny.

If the speed of light is ∞, it violates the principle of constancy of the speed of light.

However, when "division by 0" and "∞" appear, we are stepping into a "singularity" that cannot be explained in the framework of modern mathematics and physics, so it is natural that contradictions will arise.

But mathematicians and physicists should not laugh at this.

Because it is their job to resolve contradictions like "singularity".

If you search the image of "space history", you can see many illustrations in the shape of "⊂".

In the past, this shape used to be "<".

This needle-like point on the left side was a "singular point" with "energy ∞" and a size of "0", and was regarded as an area where physical calculation was impossible.

The rounded tip is the idea of ​​introducing "imaginary numbers" advocated by a physicist.

that's right.

The "singularity" is not a "wall of despair" that humanity cannot overcome, but a "new world" to open up.

【from beginning to end】

Now, let's consider "the universe you live in" from its "beginning" to "end" at once.

Currently, the generally accepted age of the universe is about 13.8 billion years.

In other words, 13.8 billion years ago on the time axis, both time and space are "0".

'0' is the 'equilibrium' state, as mentioned above, from which nothing can change.

However, in this blog, "0" and "∞" are considered to be relative existences from the observer's perspective.

If so, the universe seen from the inner viewpoint was in a state of "high vacuum energy" with only "∞" energy at the beginning, where there was no space-time and no matter.

According to the laws of nature, matter and energy have the property of ``spontaneous symmetry breaking,'' in which they move from ``easy-to-change unstable high positions'' to ``hard-to-change stable low positions.''

In other words, nature is oriented towards "stability".

In the "universe you live in", a transition from a "high vacuum energy" state to a "low vacuum energy" state, that is, a "cosmic phase transition" has occurred.

As a result, the one force of the "high vacuum energy" was divided into the "four forces" of gravity, strong force, weak force, and electromagnetic force. It will expand exponentially.

Quantum particles form elementary particles and elementary particles form molecules due to the action of these "four forces".

Just like high temperature "water vapor" confined in a narrow space is released into a wide space, the temperature drops rapidly and solidifies into something visible like "water" or "ice".

Furthermore, due to gravity, the matter is partially biased and "crowded" to form an atomic galaxy.

Drifting dust there "clumps" and forms "stars".

In a "star", as a result of "crowding" due to strong gravity, elementary particles and molecules polymerize and new substances are created.

The macromolecules that formed primitive life, your ancestors, were also created in this way.

Primitive lifeforms, which were initially single-celled, "densely" to form colonies and begin communal life.

In the colony, we will “barter” “necessary substances” and “unnecessary substances” with each other to “make efficiency” of life activities.

In addition, depending on the type, a life form that adopts a division of labor system and promotes "efficiency" will appear.

Groups of organisms that used to "barter" among different species eventually became "symbiotes" and aggregated into a single cell to increase "efficiency".

In addition, unicellular organisms that establish a division of labor for each individual within the same species will eventually evolve into a single multicellular organism and increase "efficiency".

Then, among the "species" that evolved into animals, individuals "densely" form colonies and start living in groups, just like they did when they were single-celled organisms.

"Efficiency" through "barter" and "division of labor" will also be carried out through the same process as in the age of single-celled organisms.

"You" also live within the framework of a large "division of labor" in a "colony" called "society."

And although there is a cushion of money, the essence of "barter" still remains the same.

In thermodynamics, there is something called the law of increasing entropy.

If the universe is an isolated system, it is the law that the entropy will continue to increase from the past to the future within the time axis.

"Entropy" is a quantity that expresses the degree of disorder.

However, I think that the essence is the same as "spontaneous symmetry breaking".

In other words, "transition from an unstable position with a low probability of being able to stay there to a stable position with a high probability".

The universe begins with low entropy and continues to increase.

Eventually, "entropy" will be maximized and the entire universe will be in a state of "thermal equilibrium".

"Thermal equilibrium" means that no heat transfer occurs when two objects are brought into contact with each other.

Once in this state, physical changes are no longer possible in the future timeline.

This seems to be the end of the universe.

【order of nature】

So far, I have given an overview of the beginning of the universe, the current you, and the end of the universe.

Among them, the keywords are "stability," "denseness," and "efficiency."

The laws of nature point to a "stable state of no change".

As a result of following the law, there is a "crowding of matter and living organisms".

Furthermore, there is "efficiency" as a result of that "crowding".

In other words, "crowding" is a process leading to "stability", and "efficiency" is a natural order.

And "efficiency" creates "competition" and "individual vs. organizational battle".

For example, ``macrophage'', a type of white blood cell in ``your body'', protects ``you'' by phagocytosing bacteria that invade from the outside, but ``macrophage'' has the same origin as heart cells. is the one with

However, "macrophages" have a lifespan of only a few months, whereas cardiomyocytes theoretically have a lifespan of over 100 years.

Originally, the same “you” cell that was just a single fertilized egg is assigned to various specialized organs and lives a variety of lives, which constitutes “your body”. fate of individual cells.

"Efficiency" comes from "a division of labor system consisting of individuals with specialties".

"Expertise" means that by repeatedly performing the same type of work, unnecessary movements are removed, and as a result, "the same amount of work can be done with less energy."

This conforms to the laws of nature.

Furthermore, "expertise" is premised on the existence of "division of labor".

Because having "specialty" means not having "versatility".

This is because it cannot produce all the materials necessary for life on its own, or even if it does, it will significantly impede the overall efficiency.

For example, you, the blacksmith of farm equipment, are hungry.

"You" can make baguettes, but it's cheaper to buy them at a bakery in town, so I'll buy baguettes from the bakery.

Bakers source flour from farmers to make baguettes.

Farmers will procure farm equipment from you to make flour.

A society where everyone can live efficiently should have such a division of labor system.

By the way, in the "agricultural equipment industry" to which "you" belong, "market competition" is born in which only craftsmen who can provide better products at lower prices can survive, and the "competitive principle" works.

In order for "you" to survive, you will be forced to improve your skills as a craftsman and continue to make efforts to be more "efficient".

This will lead to competition not only between “you” but also between “organizations” at all levels, such as “between companies,” “between industries,” and “between nations.”

This is also the order of nature.

And as the organizational level increases, the importance of the "individual" "you" to the "denominator" decreases.

Someday, "you" will become a replaceable gear in the organization.

Just like a single "macrophage" in "your body"...

Is it right?

Is "your life" a "life for someone else"?

From the next time, let's consider "your life".